Is Figma and Zeplin Same?

Figma and Zeplin are two popular tools used in the field of web and mobile app design. Both of these tools have a lot of features, but they have some key differences that set them apart.

Figma is a powerful vector-based design tool, which allows designers to create stunning graphics and designs with ease.

With Figma, designers can quickly create complex visuals with its intuitive user interface and powerful features such as layers, groups, styles, and grids. It also offers features such as collaboration tools, version control, and asset library management. It is also very affordable compared to other design tools.

Zeplin is a cloud-based platform that provides developers with the ability to quickly inspect designs created in Figma or Sketch. With Zeplin, developers can view the details of a design without having to open up the program itself.

They can also quickly generate code snippets from their designs using Zeplin’s built-in code generator. Additionally, Zeplin also provides collaboration tools for teams to work together on projects.

Key Differences Between Figma and Zeplin:

Design Features: Figma has more design features than Zeplin does because it is designed specifically for creating visuals while Zeplin focuses mainly on providing developers with code snippets.

Pricing: Figma’s pricing model is more affordable than Zeplin’s as it offers a free plan while Zeplin only offers paid plans.

Collaboration Tools: While both tools offer collaboration tools for teams to work together on projects, Figma has more advanced options for collaboration than Zeplin does.

Code Generator: Although both tools provide code generators for developers to easily generate code snippets from their designs, Zeppelin has more advanced options than Figma does.

In conclusion, while both Figma and Zeppelin have their advantages when it comes to web and mobile app design projects, they serve different purposes. Figma is better suited for creating visuals while Zeppelin is better suited for development purposes such as code generation. Therefore they cannot be considered the same tool but instead should be seen as complementary products that can be used together depending on the project needs.